Communities of Practice (Healthcare)
Summary of "Communities of Practice in Alberta Health: Advancing a Learning Organization"Auer, A., Hanson, P., Brady-Fryer, B., Alati-it, J., & Johnson, A. (2020). Communities of practice in Alberta Health: Advancing a learning organization. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(86), 1- 12. https://discovery.ebsco.com/c/4ax45t/viewer/html/af4msvzyjv
Alberta Health Services:
Canada's first and largest fully integrated healthcare system.
Formed by amalgamating nine regional health authorities and three provincial services.
Communities of Practice (CoPs):
Regularly meet to learn from each other and improve healthcare services.
Embody the principles of a learning organization, focusing on team learning.
Five Disciplines of Learning Organization:
Systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models, building shared vision, team learning.
Team learning is central, and CoPs exemplify this.
Functions and Structures of CoPs:
Practice domain/expertise, focus, membership boundaries, attendance methods, sphere of influence.
Provide meaningful interactions, build information pathways, and enhance capacity for patient care.
Meaningful Interactions:
Improve staff engagement, create a safe space for idea sharing, connect professionals, address geographic isolation, and strengthen professional identity.
Building Information Pathways:
Enhance information flow, transcend organizational boundaries, and promote timely knowledge sharing.
Capacity to Address Patient Needs:
Implement change at the point of care, utilize frontline knowledge, and address patient needs effectively.
CoPs and Systems Change:
Impact innovation, employee retention, process standardization, risk management, psychological health, talent management, professional development, and workload management.
Challenges and Perspectives:
Seen as time-consuming; supervisors may view CoP activities as non-designated work priorities.
CoPs enable connections, create pathways for information sharing, spark innovation, and spot issues early.
Systems Thinking in CoPs:
Helps members understand how their actions disrupt standard operating patterns to create change in the larger system.
Shifting Stance on CoP Structure:
No evidence that CoPs can be deliberately cultivated.
Membership boundaries defined by subject matter expertise, practice, role, and geographic considerations.
Boundary Spanning:
Required for CoPs to influence beyond local boundaries.
Informational boundary spanning is powerful for communication within and outside the organization.
Legitimate Peripheral Participation:
Individuals can benefit from CoPs even without active participation; listening and learning are valuable.
Suddman's Fire Principle:
CoPs allow issues to be identified and addressed early.
Visibility of CoPs:
Participants express disappointment that the value of CoPs is not well understood across organizations.
The value is more visible at the macro or collective level, rather than at the micro level.