Evaluating Assessment Notes:
Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences
Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences suggests that intelligence is not a single, fixed attribute, but rather a variety of distinct types of intelligences. Gardner initially proposed seven intelligences and later added an eighth and discussed a possible ninth. This theory challenges the traditional view of a single, generalized intelligence measured by IQ tests.
Linguistic Intelligence:
Definition: Sensitivity to spoken and written language, ability to learn languages, and capacity to use language to accomplish goals.
Examples: Poets, writers, lawyers, and speakers.
Applications: Encouraging activities that involve storytelling, writing, reading, and word games.
Logical-Mathematical Intelligence:
Definition: Capacity to analyze problems logically, carry out mathematical operations, and investigate issues scientifically.
Examples: Scientists, mathematicians, engineers.
Applications: Incorporating puzzles, experiments, and logical problem-solving tasks into learning activities.
Spatial Intelligence:
Definition: Ability to recognize and manipulate the patterns of space both in large-scale spaces (like navigators) and more confined areas (like sculptors).
Examples: Architects, artists, pilots.
Applications: Using visual aids, mind mapping, and spatial reasoning tasks to enhance learning.
Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence:
Definition: Ability to use one’s body skillfully and handle objects adroitly.
Examples: Athletes, dancers, surgeons.
Applications: Integrating physical activities, hands-on learning, and role-playing into the curriculum.
Musical Intelligence:
Definition: Skill in performance, composition, and appreciation of musical patterns.
Examples: Musicians, composers, music critics.
Applications: Incorporating music, rhythm, and sounds into teaching methods and assignments.
Interpersonal Intelligence:
Definition: Ability to understand and interact effectively with others.
Examples: Teachers, social workers, politicians.
Applications: Fostering group activities, discussions, and collaborative projects.
Intrapersonal Intelligence:
Definition: Capacity to understand oneself and one’s thoughts and feelings, and to use such knowledge in planning and directing one’s life.
Examples: Philosophers, psychologists, theologians.
Applications: Encouraging self-reflection, journaling, and activities that require personal introspection.
Naturalist Intelligence (added later):
Definition: Ability to recognize and classify plants, animals, and other aspects of nature.
Examples: Biologists, environmentalists, farmers.
Applications: Using nature-based projects, outdoor activities, and ecological studies to teach concepts.
Existential Intelligence (proposed):
Definition: Sensitivity and capacity to tackle deep questions about human existence.
Examples: Philosophers, theologians, some educators.
Applications: Engaging in discussions about life, purpose, and existential topics.
Bloom’s Taxonomy
Bloom's Taxonomy provides a framework for categorizing educational goals. It helps in designing assessments and curricula by specifying the level of cognitive complexity required for learning outcomes.
Cognitive Domain (Revised by Anderson and Krathwohl):
Remembering: Recalling information (e.g., dates, events, definitions).
Keywords: Define, list, memorize, recall.
Example: List the seven domains of Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences.
Understanding: Explaining ideas or concepts (e.g., summarizing, describing).
Keywords: Describe, explain, summarize, interpret.
Example: Explain the purpose of formative assessments.
Applying: Using information in new situations (e.g., implementing, using).
Keywords: Apply, demonstrate, use, execute.
Example: Apply Bloom’s Taxonomy to create learning objectives for a lesson plan.
Analyzing: Breaking information into parts to explore understandings and relationships (e.g., differentiating, organizing).
Keywords: Analyze, differentiate, organize, relate.
Example: Analyze the differences between formative and summative assessments.
Evaluating: Justifying a decision or course of action (e.g., appraising, arguing, judging).
Keywords: Evaluate, critique, justify, assess.
Example: Evaluate the effectiveness of a rubric in assessing student learning.
Creating: Producing new or original work (e.g., designing, constructing).
Keywords: Create, design, construct, formulate.
Example: Create a rubric for a project-based learning assessment.
Affective Domain:
Receiving: Awareness and willingness to hear.
Keywords: Listen, notice, tolerate.
Example: Listen to students' feedback during a class discussion.
Responding: Active participation or reacting to stimuli.
Keywords: Respond, agree, contribute.
Example: Participate in group discussions actively.
Valuing: Recognizing the worth of something and expressing it.
Keywords: Appreciate, cherish, respect.
Example: Value the importance of diverse perspectives in a classroom.
Organizing: Integrating values into one’s own system and prioritizing them.
Keywords: Organize, balance, systematize.
Example: Organize your teaching practice to reflect inclusive education values.
Characterizing: Consistently acting according to values.
Keywords: Display, internalize, exemplify.
Example: Exemplify ethical behavior in all interactions with students.
Psychomotor Domain (often associated with manual or physical skills):
Perception: Use of sensory cues to guide motor activity.
Keywords: Detect, observe, recognize.
Example: Recognize the steps in performing a complex task.
Set: Readiness to act (mental, physical, and emotional).
Keywords: Begin, move, show, start.
Example: Begin to demonstrate a skill with confidence.
Guided Response: Early stages of learning complex skills, including imitation and trial and error.
Keywords: Attempt, copy, practice, follow.
Example: Practice a new technique under guidance.
Mechanism: Intermediate stage in learning where movements are more coordinated.
Keywords: Calibrate, perform, manipulate.
Example: Perform a skill with greater proficiency.
Complex Overt Response: Skillful performance of complex movements.
Keywords: Coordinate, control, manage.
Example: Manage a series of movements in a dance routine.
Adaptation: Modifying movement patterns to fit special requirements.
Keywords: Adapt, alter, change.
Example: Adapt a learned skill to a new situation.
Origination: Creating new movement patterns to fit a particular situation or problem.
Keywords: Create, design, invent.
Example: Create a new pattern for a sport or dance move.
Evaluation Models
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model
Reaction:
Definition: Measures how participants respond to the training (e.g., satisfaction and engagement).
Method: Surveys, feedback forms.
Application: Use post-training surveys to gauge participant satisfaction and gather feedback for improvements.
Learning:
Definition: Assesses the increase in knowledge or skills as a result of the training.
Method: Pre- and post-tests, assessments, quizzes.
Application: Administer tests before and after the training to measure knowledge or skill gains.
Behavior:
Definition: Evaluates how well participants apply what they learned when they are back on the job.
Method: Observations, follow-up interviews, performance reviews.
Application: Conduct follow-up assessments to see if training participants are applying new skills or behaviors in their work.
Results:
Definition: Examines the tangible outcomes of the training, such as increased productivity or improved quality.
Method: Business metrics analysis, ROI calculations.
Application: Analyze business data to determine the impact of training on performance metrics.
Phillips' ROI Model
Building on Kirkpatrick's model, Jack Phillips introduced a fifth level to evaluate the financial return on investment (ROI).
Return on Investment (ROI):
Definition: Quantifies the financial return of the training by comparing the benefits (results) to the costs of the training.
Method: ROI formula: ROI (%)=(Net Program BenefitsProgram Costs)×100\text{ROI (\%)} = \left( \frac{\text{Net Program Benefits}}{\text{Program Costs}} \right) \times 100ROI (%)=(Program CostsNet Program Benefits)×100
Application: Calculate the monetary value of training benefits and compare it to the costs to