Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reflection and Reflexivity in Practice Versus in Theory: Challenges of Conceptualization, Complexity, and Competence. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 307–314. https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=308ea135-92dd-35e4-868f-417f44183042

Main Points:

  1. Development of Desirable Epistemic Habits:

    • Begins at the outset of professional development.

    • Learning goals and cognitive processes should focus on developing desirable epistemic habits of mind and practice.

    • Thought and planning about deep understanding and critical analytic abilities increases likelihood of students developing them.

  2. Role of Verbal Interactions:

    • Core to learning and instruction.

    • Natural platform for externalizing and fostering understanding of knowledge and process of knowing.

  3. Principles of Reflection and Reflexivity:

    • Reflection and reflexivity are not new concepts.

    • Directed to belief, cognition, and behaviors pertaining to knowledge and process of knowing.

    • Reflective practice and actions are cornerstones.

  4. Conceptualization:

    • Educators need to reflect on epistemic aims and goals for instructions and assessments.

    • Clear understanding of reflection versus reflexivity is crucial.

    • Distinctions between information and knowledge are essential.

  5. Complexity:

    • Reality of theoretical principles in educational practice.

    • Educational settings involve multiple aims and decisions guided by various concerns.

    • Grain size of educational aims affects instructional strategies.

  6. Competence:

    • Disposition to engage in reasoning and practices formed by context.

    • Adaptive knowledge building or judging evidence according to disciplinary norms.

    • Acknowledging what educators are asked to accomplish is crucial for informed reflexivity.

  7. Integration into Educational Practice:

    • Need to demonstrate how research can be tied to everyday classroom practices.

    • Incorporating theory and research into curriculum development and instructional practices is essential.

Reflections:

  • Strengths:

    • Comprehensive analysis of the role of reflection and reflexivity in education.

    • Clear distinction between reflection and reflexivity.

    • Emphasis on the importance of contextual elements in fostering competence.

  • Areas for Improvement:

    • Clarification on the practical implementation of theoretical principles.

    • Exploration of specific strategies for integrating epistemic habits into educational practice.

    • Consideration of potential barriers to implementing reflective practices in diverse educational settings.

  • No labels