Global Citizenship
- Darlene Edgar
Grad, J. M., & Zande, I. S. v. d. (2022). Cultivating global citizenship through higher education: A reflection on the development from civic to global engagement. Education Sciences, 12(11), 766. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2734620255?accountid=142373
Introduction to Civic Engagement:
Civic engagement is promoted for individual flourishing and societal aims like fostering democracy and participation.
It involves active participation in civic activities and focuses on civic enterprises intensely.
Connection between civic engagement and functioning democracy is emphasized due to active citizen participation.
Types of Citizens:
Responsible citizens fulfill civic duties.
Participatory citizens are active members of the community.
Social reformers try to address civil problems and bring them to the public's attention.
Dimensions of Civic Identity and Engagement:
Social trust and generalized reciprocity.
Civic knowledge and skills for involvement in civil society and democracy.
Pro-civic attitudes and mindset to make positive contributions.
Participatory activities for the betterment of the community.
Importance of Civic Engagement:
It is a necessity, not just a nice-to-have aspect.
Engagement focuses on different aspects and is organized differently depending on governance structures.
Service Learning and Civic Engagement in Higher Education:
Service learning is used to incorporate civic engagement into higher education.
It enhances student learning, development, and commitment to future civic involvement.
Meaningful work connected to actual community needs is emphasized.
Globalization and Its Impact:
Globalization creates a more interconnected world with economic and social changes.
It shifts the labor market towards internationalization and requires newer skills to meet civic duties.
Individuals need to take responsibility for global societal challenges and engage in multicultural community events.
Steps to Meet the Needs of Globalization:
Thinking globally and extending knowledge across borders.
Institutionalization of civic engagement into the curriculum and learning environment.
Using appropriate teaching approaches to foster global engagement and citizenship.
Definition of Global Citizenship and Engagement:
Global citizenship involves rights and responsibilities toward both the local and transnational community.
Three approaches to global citizenship: radical, transformationalist, and neoliberal.
A global citizen is broad-minded, intellectually engaged with other cultures, and committed to tolerance and understanding of differences.
Developing Programs for Global Engagement:
Institutionalization requires a fundamental change in thinking about learning and engagement.
Institutions need to develop formal relationships and partnerships with international counterparts.
Effective global service learning with partnerships should benefit both sides and demand involvement from both.
Challenges and Future Directions:
Lack of research on civic engagement's effectiveness in supporting the development of competencies needed in a multicultural society and international labor market.
Need for equipping teachers with skills for interdisciplinary teaching and fostering critical thinking and understanding.
Importance of incorporating virtual classrooms and internships to remove accessibility limitations and foster global learning.
Pillay, T., & Karsgaard, C. (2023). Global citizenship education as a project for decoloniality. Education, Citizenship & Social Justice, 18(2), 214–229. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17461979221080606
Background and Methodology:
In 2016/2017, youth from every continent collaborated online to exchange ideas and create a document representing diverse voices.
The resulting paper was presented at a UNESCO global forum on global citizenship education.
This collaboration aimed to decenter notions of global citizenship education and foster epistemic disobedience.
Sociology of absences and emergencies framework was used to analyze the document, focusing on relational justice and epidemic decolonization.
Participants and Process:
Students from 11 countries participated, facilitated by teachers in secondary schools.
Various structures were used, from individual student projects to multiple classes with multiple teachers.
Virtual classrooms and digital platforms were utilized for collaboration and discussion.
Key Themes and Findings:
Relational Justice:
Nationality is central to global citizenship, challenging neoliberal notions of global community.
The co-creation process of knowledge disrupts existing sociopolitical orders and emphasizes relationality and compassion.
Education should focus on community enterprise rather than individualism, fostering unity and solidarity.
Epidemic Decolonization:
Power structures connected with colonialism, capitalism, patriarchy, and white supremacy result in global inequities.
Lack of awareness of these power structures perpetuates privilege and constrains the potential for a better life for others.
The paper aims to engage in questioning power structures and privilege, highlighting the diversity of voices and advocating for reflexive awareness within communities.
Implications and Recommendations:
The paper calls for a transformative approach to education, addressing the complexity and root causes of global issues.
It promotes understanding of different perspectives and worldviews, transparency in global power relations, and aims to transform learners, society, and educators.
Educational assistance must also be transformed to realize the aims of critical and decolonial global community engagement.
Auh, Y., & Sim, H. R. (2018). Global justice and education for global citizenship: Considerations for education policy-planning process. Asian Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 221–237. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,sso&db=a9h&AN=130416864&site=eds-live
Introduction:
The article discusses the concept of global justice and the importance of education for global citizenship in addressing global issues.
It highlights the interconnectedness of global challenges and the need for collaborative efforts to promote justice and address inequalities.
Global Citizenship and Education:
The Global Education First Initiative aimed to leverage education as a means to address global issues and foster interconnectedness.
Priorities include universal access to education, improving learning quality, and fostering global citizenship to promote respect and transformation.
Global Justice in a Globalized World:
Globalization has reshaped the understanding of justice, with economic inequalities and exploitation becoming significant issues.
Various ideologies such as universalism, cosmopolitanism, and particularism offer different perspectives on justice and citizenship.
Challenges and Opportunities of Global Citizenship:
Global citizenship education faces challenges such as ambiguity in defining citizenship and skepticism about its significance.
However, it also presents opportunities for promoting global responsibility and addressing issues like economic inequality and environmental risks.
Education for Global Citizenship:
Citizenship education evolves over time, with minimalist and maximalist approaches focusing on legal knowledge or societal diversity.
Global citizenship education aims to foster awareness of global issues, social justice, and intercultural understanding.
Pathways to Global Citizenship:
Education should encompass both formal and informal learning, covering civic engagement and technical understanding of global issues.
Global citizenship education seeks to instill core values of social justice and democracy, empowering learners to contribute to a better world.
Policy Considerations for Global Citizenship Education:
The definition and objectives of global citizenship education remain contested, requiring a transformational approach to address complex global challenges.
Educational policy frameworks need to align with the values of global citizenship and promote social and global justice.
Conclusion:
Education plays a crucial role in promoting global justice and fostering global citizenship.
Policy planning processes should prioritize the development of comprehensive frameworks for global citizenship education that address the interconnected nature of global challenges.
Auh, Y., & Sim, H. R. (2018). Global justice and education for global citizenship: Considerations for education policy-planning process. Asian Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 221–237. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,sso&db=a9h&AN=130416864&site=eds-live
Global Citizenship and Justice:
Global citizenship is founded on the idea that the world at large is unjust.
No state can achieve global justice on its own, necessitating consideration of contested issues like human rights, democracy, and environmental sustainability.
Global Education Initiative:
The global education initiative seeks to establish leverage in a rapidly changing world towards interdependence and interconnectedness.
Three priorities include placing every child in school, improving the quality of learning, and fostering global citizenship.
Challenges and Opportunities:
Global citizenship education is dynamic and contested, residing across individual subject disciplines.
Ambiguity surrounding global citizenship presents both opportunities and challenges for governments and citizens.
Reframing Justice in Globalization:
Globalization reframes the meaning of justice at local and international levels, with economic inequality growing at an unprecedented rate.
Understanding justice is crucial for shaping the future world and addressing global challenges.
Theories of Justice:
Various theories of justice, including universalism, cosmopolitanism, particularism, realism, nationalism, and society of states, shape perceptions of global justice.
Education for Global Citizenship:
Citizenship education can be minimalist or maximalist, focusing on legal and civic knowledge or societal diversity and social disadvantage.
Global citizenship education aims to teach societal impact, environmental sustainability, and social justice on a global scale.
Challenges in Education Policy:
Defining and implementing global citizenship education is complex and contested, with challenges in categorization, labeling, and understanding its impacts.
A transformational approach focusing on social and global justice is proposed as a natural pathway for addressing domestic and global issues.
Policy Planning for Global Citizenship Education:
Developing an intelligible and universally accepted policy framework for global citizenship education is essential but challenging.
Educational policy frameworks should carefully examine the feasibility of realizing objectives and addressing global challenges effectively.
In conclusion, the article highlights the complexities and importance of global citizenship education in addressing global challenges and fostering social justice on a global scale. It calls for careful policy planning and a transformational approach to education to empower learners to become active global citizens.