Policy Analysis
Tamtik, M., & Guenter, M. (2019). Policy analysis of equity, diversity and inclusion strategies in Canadian universities – how far have we come? The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 49(3), 41-56. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/policy-analysis-equity-diversity-inclusion/docview/2362897174/se-2?accountid=142373
Introduction:
Canada is known for its multiculturalism, but systemic barriers and implicit biases persist in higher education.
Current Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) agendas are criticized as superficial, and universities need to address the needs of diverse student populations.
The UNESCO 2030 framework emphasizes inclusive and equitable quality education, prompting Canadian post-secondary institutions to develop inclusive excellence principles and action plans.
Definitions and Frameworks:
Diversity goes beyond categories like gender and race, extending to principles of inclusion and recognition of differences.
Equity is associated with fairness and recognizing systemic power and privilege.
Canadian policies are influenced by legislation like the Canadian Multiculturalism Act and the Canadian Human Rights Act.
Theoretical Framework:
Critical policy studies approach policy analysis by examining policies within historical, social, economic, and cultural contexts.
Policies are not just documents but processes that shape values, decisions, and power dynamics.
Categories of Analysis:
Six main categories emerge from data analysis: definitions, political commitment, student recruitment, programmatic supports, research and scholarship, and institutional climate.
These categories provide insights into how universities define, implement, and prioritize their EDI strategies.
Key Findings:
EDI definitions tend to treat issues as one, lacking a nuanced understanding of equity and inclusion.
There are two ideological approaches to equity: fairness and inclusion, with a focus on redistributing resources or removing barriers, respectively.
Political commitment is demonstrated through hiring decisions, stakeholder involvement, and the creation of councils or committees.
Student recruitment strategies target international and indigenous students, with a focus on internationalization and indigenous recruitment indicators.
Programmatic supports include student services, scholarships, curriculum adaptations, and partnerships with indigenous communities.
Research and scholarship efforts aim to address barriers faced by equity-seeking faculty members and provide financial resources for diverse researcher groups.
Strategies related to institutional climate include statements acknowledging historical harm, diversity events, and initiatives to address psychological and behavioral climate.
Conclusion and Discussion:
Universities with diversity or equity offices tend to collect detailed information and monitor EDI activities more proactively.
There is variance in assigning responsibility for EDI, but strong administrative involvement is observed in enhancing equity agendas.
Recruitment campaigns are utilized to achieve greater diversity on campus, with economic benefits associated with recruitment strategies.
Criticisms include tokenistic slogans and the need for deeper analysis to understand intangible factors like institutional culture and overall campus climate.