Indigenous

 

Burrage, R. L., Momper, S. L., & Gone, J. P. (2022). Beyond trauma: Decolonizing understandings of loss and healing in the Indian Residential School system of Canada. Journal of Social Issues, 78(1), 27–52. https://research.ebsco.com/c/4ax45t/viewer/pdf/nzotamg5fz

  • Main Points:

    • Theoretical framework on indigenous historical trauma, highlighting cumulative effects across generations and individual life courses, including forced removal from homelands and systemic abuse in residential schools.

    • Critique of colonial approaches to mental health, advocating for restoring cultural practices and returning land and resources to indigenous communities.

    • Analysis of indigenous distress within an ecological focus versus clinical pathology like PTSD, and the limitations of clinical approaches in addressing the complex effects of residential schools.

    • Discussion on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) testimonies, emphasizing the broader impacts on families and communities beyond individual psychological effects.

    • Healing processes encompassing reconnection to others, culture, and family, emphasizing the importance of community-based and holistic approaches over clinical psychology.

  • Detailed Points:

    • Theoretical framework: Indigenous historical trauma, cumulative effects, systemic abuse in residential schools.

    • Critique of colonial approaches: Restoration of cultural practices, return of land and resources.

    • Analysis of indigenous distress: Ecological focus vs. clinical pathology like PTSD, limitations of clinical approaches.

    • TRC testimonies: Broader impacts on families and communities, beyond individual psychological effects.

    • Healing processes: Reconnection to others, culture, family; emphasis on community-based and holistic approaches.

Brunette-Debassige, C. (2023). Indigenous refusals in educational leadership practices in Canadian universities. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 19(2), 377–386. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/11771801231167876

  • Main Points:

    • Response of Canadian universities to the 94 calls to action, including the creation of indigenous initiatives offices and efforts toward transformative institutional change led by senior indigenous women.

    • Indigenous refusals as acts of resistance against problematic reconciliation discourses, political approaches to administration, co-optation of indigenous agendas, performative institutional approaches, and toxic administrative environments.

    • Struggles faced by indigenous administrators in advancing transformative change within universities, hindered by systemic racism, sexism, and colonialism.

    • Methodology: Indigenous storying approach involving 12 female administrators in Canadian universities since 2015.

    • Findings: Instances of refusing settler reconciliation discourses, settler notions of leadership, settler cooptation, settler colonial tokenism, and performative approaches.

  • Detailed Points:

    • Response of Canadian universities: Creation of indigenous initiatives offices, transformative institutional change efforts led by senior indigenous women.

    • Indigenous refusals: Acts of resistance against problematic reconciliation discourses, political approaches to administration, co-optation of indigenous agendas, performative institutional approaches, and toxic administrative environments.

    • Struggles faced by indigenous administrators: Hindered by systemic racism, sexism, and colonialism; underrepresentation in leadership positions; challenges in advancing transformative change.

    • Methodology: Indigenous storying approach involving 12 female administrators in Canadian universities since 2015.

    • Findings: Refusals to participate in problematic reconciliation discourses, settler notions of leadership, settler cooptation, settler colonial tokenism, and performative approaches.

    • Critical strategic engagement in indigenous refusal: Negotiating refusals to avoid negative stereotypes and discrediting; assessing implications, risks, and benefits on a case-by-case basis; engaging in ongoing critical self-reflexivity.

  • Implications:

    • Need for a nuanced understanding of indigenous refusals in educational leadership.

    • Recognition of the unsafe nature of academic environments for indigenous leaders.

    • Call for support and advocacy for indigenous administrators navigating systemic challenges.

Milne, E., & Wotherspoon, T. (2020). Schools as “really dangerous places” for indigenous children and youth: Schools, child welfare, and contemporary challenges to reconciliation. Canadian Review of Sociology, 57(1), 34–52. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=pbh&AN=141780004&custid=s7439054

  • Main Points:

    • Historical context: Residential schools' role in systemic destruction of indigenous families and cultural ties, leading to cultural genocide and damaging consequences for survivors, families, and communities.

    • Intersectionality of schooling and child welfare systems in Canada, contributing to challenges for meaningful reconciliation between indigenous and non-indigenous people.

    • Educational policies promoting active parental engagement and inclusive education, but concerns about the integration of child welfare practices into schools.

    • Overrepresentation of indigenous children in the Canadian child welfare system, with issues such as poverty exacerbating the situation.

    • Findings from interviews in central Alberta: tension and mistrust between schools and indigenous families, fear of child welfare authorities, and the impact of poverty on perceptions of parenting.

  • Detailed Points:

    • Historical context: Residential schools' devastating impact on indigenous families and cultural ties, leading to intergenerational trauma and challenges for reconciliation.

    • Intersectionality of schooling and child welfare: Complex interactions between systems contribute to challenges for indigenous families and children.

    • Educational policies: Emphasize active parental engagement and inclusive education but may inadvertently reinforce colonial power dynamics.

    • Overrepresentation in child welfare: Indigenous children disproportionately represented, with poverty exacerbating issues.

    • Interview findings: Tension and mistrust between schools and indigenous families, fear of child welfare involvement, and stigma surrounding poverty and parenting.

  • Theoretical Framework:

    • Understanding social actions and practices within intersecting institutional fields of families, schools, and child welfare systems.

    • Exploration of power differentials and cultural capital within these systems, affecting outcomes for indigenous children and families.

  • Implications:

    • Need for meaningful institutional transformation to address systemic barriers faced by indigenous children and families.

    • Calls for sustained engagement with indigenous communities and youth to promote inclusion and reconciliation.

    • Importance of recognizing and validating indigenous perspectives and practices within educational and child welfare systems.

 

Lamoureux, K., & Katz, J. (2020). Intersectionality, indigeneity, and inclusive education: Reimagining business as usual. Exceptionality Education International, 30(2), 12–18. https://discovery.ebsco.com/c/4ax45t/viewer/pdf/mjznmfctuz

  • Main Points:

    • Importance of considering indigenous students and peoples in efforts to design inclusive educational practices.

    • Intersectionality of issues faced by indigenous students, including racism, poverty, trauma, and disability, leading to increased risk among this group.

    • Challenges of traditional schooling systems in Canada, which often marginalize indigenous students due to cultural differences and systemic racism.

    • Need for culturally safe educational environments that respect indigenous identity, language, culture, and worldview.

    • Recognition of higher rates of learning disabilities and behavioral disorders among indigenous students, indicating systemic issues in the education system.

    • Importance of reconciliation efforts, learning from indigenous cultures, and addressing historical injustices for healing and positive change.

    • Emphasis on inclusive education practices, humanizing interactions, building relationships, and acknowledging privilege to combat racism and discrimination.

    • Role of educational leaders and principles in championing inclusive practices and supporting teachers in developing capacity for inclusive education.

  • Detailed Points:

    • Intersectionality and Inclusive Education:

      • Indigenous students face intersecting issues such as racism, poverty, trauma, and disability, making them highly at risk in traditional schooling systems.

      • Current educational practices often fail to address the cultural needs and experiences of indigenous students, leading to marginalization and systemic discrimination.

    • Cultural Safety and Systemic Racism:

      • Schools need to provide culturally safe environments that respect indigenous identity, language, and culture, in addition to physical safety from bullying and teasing.

      • Systemic racism is evident in curricular content, teaching methods, academic expectations, and disciplinary practices, contributing to the marginalization of indigenous students.

    • Reconciliation and Healing:

      • Reconciliation efforts should involve learning from indigenous cultures, acknowledging historical injustices, and working towards healing and forgiveness.

      • Educators have a responsibility to understand the truth of history and actively participate in the healing process, guided by indigenous elders and educators.

    • Inclusive Education Practices:

      • Inclusive education involves confronting otherness, racism, and discrimination through awareness, education, and building relationships.

      • Humanizing interactions through shared experiences fosters respect and understanding among diverse groups.

      • Acknowledging privilege and promoting equity are essential for creating inclusive educational environments.

    • Role of Educational Leaders:

      • Educational leaders and principles play a crucial role in championing inclusive practices and supporting teachers in their efforts to develop inclusive classrooms.

      • Their unwavering commitment to the ideals of inclusivity and equity is essential for creating positive change in the education system.

  • Implications:

    • Urgent need for educational reform to address systemic racism and marginalization faced by indigenous students.

    • Importance of culturally safe and inclusive educational environments that respect indigenous identity and culture.

    • Recognition of the role of educational leaders in championing inclusive practices and supporting teachers in their efforts to create inclusive classrooms.

    • Emphasis on reconciliation efforts, learning from indigenous cultures, and addressing historical injustices for healing and positive change in the education system.

 

Papp, T. A., & Cottrell, M. (2021). Teacher professional learning, culturally responsive/sustaining practices, and indigenous students’ success: A comparative case-study of New Zealand and Saskatchewan, Canada. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 67(2), 105–128. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=ehh&AN=150864660&custid=s7439054

  • Main Points:

    • Ongoing educational disparities faced by indigenous students, highlighting the need for teachers to embrace innovations to ensure equitable outcomes.

    • Examination of initiatives aimed at enhancing cultural responsiveness among predominantly white educators in Saskatchewan, Canada, and New Zealand.

    • Comparative analysis of educational contexts, historical backgrounds, and indigenous education strategies in both regions.

    • Importance of teacher professional learning in improving student achievement, particularly for low-achieving students.

    • Implementation of culturally responsive/sustaining practices to bridge the gap between teachers and indigenous learners, focusing on cultural discontinuity hypothesis and culturally relevant pedagogy.

    • Impact of whole-school initiatives and strategic planning on improving outcomes for indigenous students.

  • Detailed Points:

    • Educational disparities: Indigenous students face significant challenges in achieving equitable outcomes in publicly funded education systems.

    • Contextual comparison: Saskatchewan and New Zealand share historical legacies of colonization and indigenous struggles for access to formal education.

    • Graduation rates: Saskatchewan's indigenous graduation rates lag behind the provincial average, while New Zealand's indigenous students also experience disparities despite educational reforms.

    • Teacher professional learning: Meaningful and ongoing professional development opportunities are crucial for improving student achievement, especially for marginalized students.

    • Culturally responsive/sustaining practices: Professional development should incorporate culturally responsive pedagogy, acknowledging cultural differences and integrating indigenous worldviews into curriculum and instructional practices.

    • Impact on student outcomes: Implementation of culturally responsive pedagogy leads to dramatic improvements in student achievement, attendance, and graduation rates.

    • Case study approach: Utilization of multiple instrumental case studies to explore the impact of whole-school initiatives and teacher transformation on student outcomes.

    • Leadership role: School leaders play a crucial role in promoting cultural responsiveness and fostering collaborative learning environments.

    • Conclusion: Teacher professional learning serves as a catalyst for educational reform and innovation, with a focus on social justice priorities and rejecting deficit-based explanations for indigenous student outcomes.

  • Implications:

    • Emphasis on ongoing teacher professional development to enhance cultural responsiveness and improve outcomes for indigenous students.

    • Adoption of culturally sustaining practices to create inclusive learning environments that value indigenous cultures and perspectives.

    • Recognition of indigenous students' cultural attributes and experiences as assets for effective teaching and learning.

    • Need for school leadership to prioritize social justice initiatives and foster collaborative learning communities focused on student success.