Auto-Ethnography and the Other
Autoethnography and the Other - Spry (2016):
Communion with the Other:
Understanding oneself is intertwined with understanding the Other.
The self is constructed through relationships with others.
Collective Sensibilities:
Exploring how sensibilities become collective.
Theory and Healing:
Theory from a place of pain can be healing.
Autoethnography is not about staying in pain but rising above it.
Theory is liberating when intentionally sought.
Aesthetic literacy and craft are inherently political.
Performative Autoethnography:
A critical disruptive force.
Emphasizes the moral act of performing/autoethnography.
Central Question:
Focus on the societal question: "Who are we?"
Work doesn't need to answer the question but should allow exploration.
Ethical Necessity:
Examining how we conceptualize and portray the Other in ethnography.
A call for practiced vulnerability to truly listen to others' research.
Foundational Elements of Autoethnography:
Agency and identity of the Other are not in service of the self.
Embracing an unsettled 'I' influenced by sociocultural negotiations.
Autoethnography embodies utopian performances through the wilful embodiment of "we."
Care in Engagement:
Caution against inappropriate/damaging frameworks:
The other should not play a supporting role in service of the story.
Avoiding a colonizing attention to self.
Preventing the erasure of the bodied other.
Utopian Performances:
Utopian performances rooted in a commitment to hope.
Performative I:
Textualized body of the researcher.
Methodological interdependence of sociocultural reflexivity.
Assigning language to reflexivity on paper.
Embodiment of linguistic construction for an audience on stage.
Other Representation:
Emphasizes that the Other should not be merely a shadow of the self.
Autoethnographic Contributions:
Over the last 20 years, autoethnography is a profound contribution to post-theorizing.
Offers insights into epistemological, philosophical, sociocultural, and pedagogical aspects of personal and political representations.
Reflecting on Power Structures:
Autoethnography reflects on hegemonic power structures.
Considers how to navigate and arbitrate these structures in qualitative research.